Washington was thrown into chaos this week after Congresswoman Anna Paulina Luna (R-FL) made a bold and controversial demand. In a fiery press statement, Luna called for a total ban on dual citizens serving in Congress, saying divided loyalties have no place in America’s highest legislative body. Her words landed like a thunderclap across Capitol Hill, igniting fierce debate and speculation.

Luna’s proposal, while brief, carries explosive implications. “If you hold a foreign citizenship, you can’t hold power here,” she declared, emphasizing what she called an “absolute allegiance” to the United States. Her supporters are hailing it as a defining moment in restoring public trust, while critics accuse her of fueling paranoia and xenophobia.

This isn’t just about background checks or security vetting — Luna insists it’s about integrity at the core of American governance. She argues that lawmakers should answer only to the Constitution, not to any secondary nation or allegiance. “America deserves leaders whose loyalty is undivided and unquestioned,” she added, doubling down on her stance.

Behind the scenes, however, tension is mounting. Reports suggest that internal discussions and document reviews have already begun as lawmakers scramble to assess who might be affected by Luna’s demand. According to several sources, a confidential list of names allegedly tied to dual citizenship is quietly circulating among insiders.

That list, if verified, could reshape the balance of power in Washington. Some analysts say Luna’s announcement could force resignations, special elections, and even investigations into long-standing security clearances. Others believe it could set off one of the most divisive loyalty debates in modern U.S. political history.

Outside the Capitol, reactions are equally split. Nationalist groups are celebrating Luna’s call as a patriotic stand for sovereignty, while civil rights advocates warn it risks alienating millions of naturalized Americans. Social media has erupted with speculation about “who’s hiding what,” turning Luna’s proposal into a full-blown national conversation.

For now, Luna shows no sign of backing down. She insists her loyalty test isn’t about targeting individuals — it’s about defending the nation’s moral foundation. Whether this bold demand becomes law or ignites political upheaval, one thing is clear: Washington has just been shaken to its core, and the loyalty question will not fade quietly.