This article highlights the backlash faced by Oprah Winfrey and Dwayne “The Rock” Johnson following the devastating wildfires in Maui, Hawaii. Both celebrities have been criticized for their actions in the aftermath of the disaster, with some accusing them of exploiting the tragedy for personal gain. Jason Momoa, another prominent figure, has also voiced his concerns, particularly about scammers impersonating him online to solicit donations under the guise of helping the wildfire victims.

Oprah and Johnson had teamed up to create “The People’s Fund of Maui,” aiming to provide direct financial aid to those affected by the wildfires. They initiated the fund with a $10 million donation, intending to offer monthly financial support to individuals who lost their homes. However, the initiative has been met with skepticism, especially considering the immense wealth of both celebrities. Many questioned why they were asking for public donations when they could easily contribute more themselves.

Compounding the controversy, conspiracy theories have emerged, particularly around Oprah’s extensive land holdings on Maui. Some have speculated that the wildfires might be linked to a hidden agenda to acquire more land from indigenous communities. Oprah’s significant property acquisitions, including 2,000 acres on the island in March 2023, have fueled these theories, raising concerns about the motives behind her philanthropy.

Despite these accusations, Oprah has been actively involved in relief efforts, personally delivering supplies to shelters and engaging with survivors. She has emphasized her commitment to supporting the affected community, stating that when unsure of what to do, one should do whatever they can to help. However, questions remain about her absence on the ground during the fires and the suspicious circumstances surrounding her properties, which have remained undamaged.

In response to the criticism, both Oprah and Johnson have released a video statement addressing the public backlash and reaffirming their dedication to aiding those displaced by the wildfires. Despite their efforts, the skepticism and speculation continue, with some questioning the sincerity of their actions and the potential ulterior motives behind their charitable endeavors.