“FARAGE CALLS FOR A FULL SLEAZE INVESTIGATION!” 😡🔥

In one of his most explosive attacks to date, Nigel Farage has fired a direct warning at the highest levels of Britain’s government, demanding that the ethics watchdog launch an immediate and comprehensive investigation into Chancellor Rachel Reeves over what he describes as “serious deception” in the latest Budget.

Farage did not hold back.

In a statement delivered with unmistakable fury, the Reform UK leader accused Reeves of presenting a financial plan built on “distortion, fear, and carefully crafted half-truths designed to keep the public in the dark.” According to Farage, the Budget documents contain claims that cannot be verified and assumptions that “border on misinformation,” raising questions that, in his view, can no longer be ignored.

“What the British people deserve is honesty,” Farage insisted. “When the government publishes numbers that millions must rely on to plan their lives, misleading them is not just politics — it is misconduct. And misconduct must be investigated.”

But the blast did not end with Reeves.

Farage made it abundantly clear that, in his opinion, this controversy reaches far beyond a single minister.

“Prime Minister Keir Starmer is not immune,” he warned. “When a Budget is presented to the nation, it is presented by an entire administration. If deception has occurred — and I believe the evidence points that way — then responsibility sits at the top. The public has the right to know whether they have been lied to, and by whom.”

The demand has already sent ripples through Westminster.

Ethics experts have long argued that the UK’s oversight institutions rarely face political pressure of this scale. Farage’s call pushes the issue into the spotlight, forcing MPs, civil servants, and analysts to confront questions they would normally avoid in public:

How transparent is this Budget?

How accurate are the long-term forecasts?

And at what point does political spin cross into ethical violation?

For thousands of voters, the timing could not be more significant.

At a moment when households are struggling with rising costs, when wages are being stretched thinner than ever, and when trust in political leadership is already fragile, even the suggestion that key financial information might be unreliable hits hard.

Farage’s argument is simple but powerful:

When the state controls the numbers that shape the economy, those numbers must be beyond reproach — or the entire democratic contract is weakened.

Supporters online have echoed this sentiment, flooding social media with calls for “real accountability” and “answers, not excuses.” Independents and undecided voters, too, have expressed concern, not necessarily about the politics, but about the principle.

“What matters isn’t whether you agree with Farage,” wrote one commenter. “What matters is whether the public can trust what it is being told.”

Even some analysts who disagree with Farage admit that the optics are damaging.

“A Budget controversy always becomes a trust controversy,” one economist explained. “Once people begin to doubt the integrity of the data, everything built on that data becomes questionable. That’s why transparency is not optional — it is essential.”

Reeves’s office has denied any wrongdoing, calling the accusations “political theatre” and insisting that all information released adheres to standard treasury practice. Starmer’s spokesperson has likewise dismissed the calls as “an attempt to distract from Reform’s own policy weaknesses.”

But in politics, perception matters as much as fact.

Farage’s intervention has turned what might have remained a technical dispute into a national conversation about honesty, responsibility, and the moral duty of those who govern.

The ethics watchdog, usually quiet and neutral, now faces pressure unlike any it has experienced in years. Should it open a probe, the implications could stretch far beyond this Budget. Should it refuse, the political fallout could be just as intense.

For now, one thing is certain:

This is no longer a minor disagreement buried in spreadsheets and forecasts.

This has become a test —

not just of Reeves or Starmer,

but of how seriously Britain takes the integrity of its own government.

Farage’s final warning echoed long after his statement ended:

“Democracy dies not when people stop voting…

but when people stop believing.”

👇 Read more below: