In a move that has shocked the global community, former U.S. President Donald Trump has announced coordinated air strikes on three nuclear facilities in Iran. The sudden military action was declared during a press conference held late last night, where Trump cited “an immediate threat to global security” as justification. The air strikes reportedly targeted facilities believed to be involved in uranium enrichment and weapons development.

According to initial Pentagon reports, the strikes were carried out using precision-guided munitions by U.S. Air Force bombers and drones. The targeted locations include Natanz, Arak, and Fordow — key pillars in Iran’s nuclear infrastructure. While early satellite images suggest significant structural damage, there is no confirmation yet on casualties or environmental fallout.

Trump, who has remained highly active on the political stage despite leaving office, stated that the decision was made following “months of intelligence gathering” and “failed diplomatic negotiations.” He accused the Iranian regime of accelerating its nuclear program in violation of past international agreements. “We will not allow Iran to possess a nuclear bomb — not now, not ever,” Trump declared.

International leaders have reacted swiftly to the news, with mixed responses. Israel and Saudi Arabia issued statements of support, calling the move “bold” and “necessary for regional stability.” However, European allies including France and Germany urged immediate restraint, warning that this could escalate into a full-scale Middle East conflict.

Iran’s Foreign Ministry condemned the strikes as an “act of war” and promised a “strong and measured response.” Iranian military sources claimed they successfully intercepted several incoming missiles but acknowledged that damage was sustained. The country’s Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, vowed retaliation, stating, “The Islamic Republic will not remain silent in the face of aggression.”

Meanwhile, the United Nations Security Council has called an emergency session to address the unfolding crisis. Secretary-General António Guterres expressed “grave concern” and called for an urgent de-escalation to avoid further loss of life. Human rights organizations are also raising alarms about the potential humanitarian consequences if tensions spiral further.

Political analysts are divided over Trump’s motives and timing. Some speculate that the former president, currently campaigning for re-election, is leveraging military action to bolster his image as a strong leader. Others warn that bypassing Congressional approval for such strikes raises serious constitutional and legal concerns.

Back in the United States, the announcement has triggered fierce debate among lawmakers. Senate Democrats have accused Trump of acting recklessly and risking American lives abroad. In contrast, several Republican leaders praised the move, calling it a “necessary step to deter Iranian aggression.”

Markets around the world reacted almost instantly, with oil prices surging by over 6% amid fears of disruption in the Persian Gulf. Global stock indices also saw a temporary dip, reflecting investor uncertainty and geopolitical risk. Defense stocks, however, saw a sharp rise in pre-market trading.

The situation has sparked protests across major cities globally, from Washington, D.C. to Berlin, with demonstrators demanding peace and diplomacy. Social media platforms have exploded with viral hashtags like #NoMoreWar and #WorldOnEdge. Misinformation is also rapidly spreading online, prompting warnings from cybersecurity experts and media watchdogs.

Despite the international outrage, Trump has doubled down on his decision, stating, “Peace through strength is the only language Iran understands.” He also criticized past administrations for “appeasement policies” that he believes emboldened Tehran. Trump’s speech ended with a message to American allies: “Stand with us, or stand aside.”

As dawn breaks over Tehran, fears of retaliation loom large. Iran’s Revolutionary Guard has already been placed on high alert, and missile defense systems across the region are active. Civilians near the affected sites have begun evacuating, amid fears of further U.S. strikes or Iranian counterattacks.

Observers worry that this could trigger a broader regional war involving proxy forces in Iraq, Syria, and Lebanon. Hezbollah has issued a statement of solidarity with Iran, warning of “an appropriate response at the right time.” Meanwhile, Iraqi officials have called on both nations to avoid using their territory for military operations.

With tensions reaching a boiling point, world leaders are urging both sides to return to diplomatic channels. China’s Foreign Ministry has offered to host emergency peace talks, while Russia condemned the strike and warned against “unilateral actions that destabilize international security.” The future of the Iran nuclear deal now hangs in the balance, as uncertainty grips the world.

This marks one of the most dramatic foreign policy moments of the decade and raises fundamental questions about global order, military power, and national sovereignty. As the world watches, the hope for peace remains — but so too does the specter of war. The coming hours may determine whether diplomacy or destruction prevails.