Jeanine Pirro, a polarizing figure known for her fiery rhetoric on Fox News and her recent appointment as interim U.S. Attorney for D.C., has once again found herself at the center of a viral controversy. A claim spreading across social media alleges that Pirro called for a boycott of Pride Month, declaring, “Pride isn’t about celebrating — it’s about being sober and boycotting the culture that’s being forced upon our children.” According to the narrative, Republicans immediately rallied behind her, taking unspecified actions to support her stance. But does this explosive story hold up under scrutiny? A closer look reveals no evidence of such a statement or coordinated Republican response, suggesting the claim may be a fabrication designed to inflame cultural divides.
Pirro’s history with LGBTQ issues is complex and offers context for why such a claim might gain traction. During her 2006 campaign for New York Attorney General, Pirro positioned herself as a moderate Republican, supporting civil unions for same-sex couples and advocating for anti-discrimination protections for LGBTQ individuals. She participated in a Pride parade and a Log Cabin Republicans fundraiser, earning their endorsement. However, she opposed same-sex marriage and later, in 2013, interviewed William Owens of the anti-LGBTQ National Organization for Marriage on her Fox News show, offering no pushback to his anti-gay remarks. More recently, in 2024, Pirro made controversial comments on The Five, criticizing transgender inclusion in women’s sports and bathrooms, which critics labeled as bigoted. These remarks align with her broader conservative rhetoric but fall short of an explicit call to boycott Pride Month.
The lack of verifiable sources for the alleged boycott statement is telling. No major news outlet, including those critical of Pirro, has reported such a declaration. Posts on X, which often amplify controversial claims, show no trace of Pirro announcing a Pride Month boycott in 2025. Instead, the claim seems to echo broader conservative talking points about “woke culture” and protecting children, themes Pirro has touched on in the past. For instance, her 2024 comments on transgender issues framed them as a threat to societal norms, a sentiment that could be misconstrued or exaggerated into a boycott narrative. The absence of evidence suggests this story may be a distortion, possibly originating from satirical or clickbait sources.
If Pirro had made such a statement, it would likely have ignited a firestorm. Republicans, particularly those aligned with Trump, might have amplified her message through legislation or public campaigns, as seen in past culture war battles. For example, recent GOP efforts to restrict transgender rights in sports or education could be framed as aligned with a boycott of “forced” cultural shifts. However, without concrete actions tied to Pirro’s alleged statement, this part of the claim remains speculative. Conversely, LGBTQ advocates and progressive commentators would likely have condemned Pirro, as seen in 2019 when her anti-Muslim comments about Rep. Ilhan Omar led to advertiser boycotts and a temporary suspension from Fox News.
The timing of this claim, coinciding with WorldPride 2025 in D.C., adds to its plausibility but also its suspect nature. Pirro’s new role as a federal prosecutor places her in a high-profile position, making her a target for both supporters and critics. False narratives, like this alleged boycott, thrive in today’s media environment, where sensationalism drives engagement. While Pirro’s past suggests she could make provocative statements, no evidence supports this specific claim. It serves as a reminder to verify information critically, especially when it aligns too neatly with existing cultural fault lines.
