Jesse Watters is making headlines after proposing a new initiative aimed at preventing billionaire philanthropist George Soros from allegedly financing protest activity across the United States.

The Fox News host argues that hidden financial networks are shaping demonstrations in ways that mislead the public about their origins. His proposal seeks to bring greater transparency to what he describes as “coordinated influence operations.”
According to Watters, the initiative would introduce mechanisms to classify certain forms of protest-related funding as potential coordination under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations (RICO) Act. This classification could allow federal investigators to scrutinize financial pathways that might otherwise remain concealed. Watters claims such action is necessary to protect democratic processes from being steered by unaccountable entities.

If enacted, the proposal has the potential to freeze Soros-linked activist networks overnight by subjecting their operations to immediate legal review. Supporters argue that this could curb what they see as engineered unrest designed to shape political narratives. Critics, meanwhile, warn that such steps risk criminalizing legitimate activism and philanthropic giving.
The initiative arrives amid growing national debate over the role of major donors and nonprofit organizations in fueling political expression. Some lawmakers have expressed interest in exploring the issue further, especially as large-scale protests continue to influence public opinion and legislative priorities. Others caution that targeting donors sets a dangerous precedent that could be weaponized across the political spectrum.

As momentum builds, both legal experts and civil liberties groups are preparing for intense scrutiny of the proposal’s constitutional implications. Questions remain about how the RICO Act—traditionally used against organized crime—would apply to advocacy movements and grant-making networks. For now, the proposal underscores a rapidly escalating struggle over transparency, influence, and control in American political life.