EXCLUSIVE: Inside the Kimmel and Colbert Alliance to Abandon Network TV and Launch the Uncensored ‘Truth News’ Revolution – nh

It began with a single host being pulled from the airwaves. It has ended with a revolution that threatens to burn the entire system of late-night television to the ground. In a move that has sent a seismic shockwave through the media industry, bitter rivals Jimmy Kimmel and Stephen Colbert are joining forces. Sources close to both hosts confirm they are in the final stages of a plan to walk away from their lucrative, career-defining network contracts at ABC and CBS to launch an independent, uncensored digital channel: ‘Truth News.’ This is not just a power play; it is a declaration of war against the corporate structures they believe are strangling free expression.

The catalyst for this late-night revolt was the abrupt, unexplained suspension of Jimmy Kimmel. After weeks of his increasingly pointed commentary on the political manipulation surrounding the death of activist Charlie Kirk, ABC executives summarily executed his removal. But what the network intended as a quiet neutering of a problematic voice ignited a firestorm. In an unprecedented act of solidarity, Jimmy Fallon, Seth Meyers, and John Oliver refused to tape their own shows, plunging network television’s most profitable bloc into a blackout. “If they try to bury us,” one host was quoted as saying, “we’ll just build somewhere new.”

It turns out, that’s exactly what Kimmel and Colbert were planning to do. While the boycott created chaos, the two titans of late-night were finalizing a plan that had been secretly in motion for weeks. The duo, who have spent two decades competing for the same audience, recognized a shared threat that was greater than their rivalry: the slow, creeping hand of network censorship. Colbert had reportedly bristled under pressure to “tone down” his political edge for years. For Kimmel, his suspension was the final, unforgivable insult. Their joint venture, Truth News, is their answer—a platform built on a radical promise: no network notes, no advertiser complaints, no executive oversight.

The concept is both breathtakingly simple and logistically audacious. Truth News aims to be a direct-to-consumer independent media outlet, likely funded by subscriptions, that will stream nightly. It represents a colossal gamble. Kimmel and Colbert are preparing to walk away from a combined salary north of $30 million a year and the institutional power of legacy media. They are betting that their personal brands, and the loyalty of their millions of viewers, are more powerful than the networks that built them. They are betting that in 2025, the broadcast tower is no longer a TV antenna in Manhattan, but the internet itself.

This move exposes the fundamental, rotting disconnect at the heart of modern television. Networks sell advertisers access to a mass audience, a model that demands broad, inoffensive programming. Yet, late-night TV has evolved into a key battleground in the culture wars, with hosts acting as satirists, commentators, and, for many, trusted news sources. This duality was never sustainable. The attempt to muzzle Kimmel was a desperate act by a legacy institution to reclaim control over a narrative it had long since lost. The result was a catastrophic miscalculation that has not only failed to silence one host but has now triggered the potential exodus of the industry’s most valuable talent.

The implications are profound. If the Kimmel Colbert project succeeds, it could trigger a mass extinction event for traditional late-night. Why would any top-tier talent remain shackled to a network when a viable, more creatively fulfilling, and potentially more lucrative independent path exists? This is not just about comedy; it’s a playbook for any creator, from journalists to documentarians, who feel constrained by corporate gatekeepers. It signals the maturation of the creator economy, where the real power is no longer the distributor, but the trusted individual with a direct line to their audience.

Of course, the path forward is fraught with risk. What does “truth” mean on a channel run by two of the most prominent liberal satirists in America? While it promises freedom from corporate censorship, it could easily become a more powerful and well-funded echo chamber, further fracturing a shared national reality. Without the institutional checks and balances of a news organization, the line between commentary and propaganda could blur, and the promise of “no filters” could simply mean no accountability.

For now, the networks are in a state of panic, issuing vague statements about creative freedom while scrambling to prevent a total collapse. But the momentum appears unstoppable. The suspension of Jimmy Kimmel was meant to be an act of control. Instead, it has become the shot heard ‘round the media world, a moment of defiance that has united old rivals and may have just launched a new, unregulated, and utterly unpredictable era of television. The era of safe, sanitized late-night is over. The revolution will be live-streamed.