“We Don’t Have a President That Submits”: Johnny Joey Jones Highlights Trump’s Tough Stance on Moscow as Nuclear Submarines Are Positioned Near Russia
Washington, D.C. — In a rare public statement, political commentator and military veteran Johnny Joey Jones has praised former President Donald Trump for his tough stance on Russia, specifically applauding his decision to strategically position U.S. nuclear submarines near Russian waters. According to Jones, this move signals a strong departure from the more cautious foreign policy approach under the previous administration, one that often leaned towards diplomatic engagement over military escalation.
Speaking on a popular political talk show, Jones, known for his unapologetic and blunt rhetoric, pointed to the growing tensions between the U.S. and Russia as a backdrop for Trump’s bold military maneuvers. “We don’t have a president that submits,” Jones declared, referencing Trump’s no-nonsense approach to international affairs. He argued that Trump’s unapologetic policies were a stark contrast to President Joe Biden’s more measured tactics, which Jones believes have failed to deter Russian aggression.
A New Era of U.S. Military Posturing
The decision to position U.S. nuclear submarines off the Russian coastline comes amidst an increasingly hostile geopolitical landscape, with Moscow’s growing military activity in Eastern Europe and the Middle East. The United States, under Trump, had already taken a more aggressive stance on defense spending and military readiness, which was particularly evident during his tenure in office. Trump’s “America First” policy was built around making sure that U.S. strength was unmatched, particularly in military terms.
Jones argues that this military maneuver is a clear reflection of Trump’s legacy of military superiority and a direct response to Russia’s expanding influence. “Trump made it clear from day one — he was not going to let any adversary bully the United States,” Jones continued. “His actions spoke louder than words. Moving nuclear submarines near Russia sends a strong message not just to Moscow, but to the world. The days of diplomatic appeasement are over.”
In stark contrast, critics have noted that President Biden’s administration has emphasized diplomacy and multilateralism in dealing with Russia. Some have even accused the Biden administration of being slow to respond to Russian provocations, particularly during the ongoing conflict in Ukraine. However, Jones suggests that this approach has only emboldened Russia’s President Vladimir Putin.
“While Biden is still trying to negotiate, Putin sees it as weakness,” Jones added. “Trump was the kind of leader who would walk into the room and make it clear that the U.S. would not back down.”
Trump’s Military Strategy and Russia
Under Trump’s leadership, the U.S. military saw increased funding and an emphasis on modernizing its nuclear arsenal. One of the key elements of Trump’s foreign policy was his willingness to engage in high-stakes military posturing, often making decisions that left both allies and adversaries on edge. The move to position nuclear submarines in close proximity to Russia is seen as part of that strategy, a demonstration of U.S. resolve that aims to put the Kremlin on notice.
This move follows a pattern of military tactics that Trump championed during his time in office. Under his administration, U.S. military capabilities were bolstered through a combination of enhanced nuclear deterrence, investments in cyber warfare, and a more aggressive stance on issues like territorial disputes in the South China Sea. The U.S. also ramped up its military presence in Eastern Europe and reinforced its commitment to NATO, which Trump once famously critiqued but later reaffirmed as a vital alliance in the face of Russian aggression.
“Trump never wanted to show weakness on the world stage,” Jones explained. “He recognized the importance of strength, not just in words, but in action. And positioning nuclear submarines so close to Russia is a prime example of that.”
Russia’s Response and Global Reactions
Since the deployment of U.S. nuclear submarines near Russian waters, Moscow has issued pointed warnings, calling the move a provocative act that heightens the risk of conflict. Russian officials have warned that they will not tolerate what they consider to be U.S. military encroachment on their borders.
In a recent statement, Russia’s Ministry of Defense emphasized that it would continue to monitor the situation closely, and if necessary, take countermeasures to ensure the protection of its territorial integrity. Despite these warnings, U.S. officials have maintained that the positioning of nuclear submarines is entirely within international law and is necessary for maintaining a credible deterrent against potential Russian aggression.
Meanwhile, global reactions have been mixed. European allies of the U.S. have expressed concern over the rising tensions, fearing that such aggressive posturing could lead to a new arms race or, worse, a military conflict. At the same time, some experts argue that this move may serve as a wake-up call for Russia and compel Putin to reconsider his aggressive military strategies.
“Let’s be clear about what this means: the United States is no longer willing to be passive,” said Michael Rubin, a former Pentagon official and Middle East expert. “Trump’s policies, though controversial, were predicated on strength and deterrence. By deploying nuclear submarines in such close proximity to Russian territory, the U.S. is signaling to Moscow that any adventurism will come at a very high cost.”
Trump’s Legacy on Foreign Policy
For many supporters of Donald Trump, this aggressive stance on Russia is seen as one of his foreign policy successes. Throughout his presidency, Trump’s handling of international relations was often characterized by direct, confrontational tactics aimed at achieving strategic goals through military and economic pressure rather than relying solely on diplomacy.
“Trump understood that peace through strength was the only way to deal with hostile regimes,” Jones remarked. “If you show weakness, you get taken advantage of. Trump didn’t let that happen.”
As tensions continue to rise between the U.S. and Russia, many are wondering how the Biden administration will respond. Will it mirror Trump’s tough approach, or will it continue to pursue diplomatic solutions? Only time will tell, but for now, the legacy of Trump’s military posturing remains a potent reminder that the world’s superpower is never far from flexing its muscle when necessary.